<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life and Death in Haute Cuisine</title>
	<link>http://paperpalate.net/2006/06/04/life_and_death_in_haute_cuisine/</link>
	<description>Food and wine in magazines and newspapers, cookbook reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: dejamo</title>
		<link>http://paperpalate.net/2006/06/04/life_and_death_in_haute_cuisine/#comment-295</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paperpalate.net/2006/06/04/life_and_death_in_haute_cuisine/#comment-295</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Nicole.  I think you've hit it in a nutshell--I never felt as if I were there in his kitchen.  As I mentioned in the review, the book was meticulously researched, but the details were presented in a dry, "as reported by" kind of way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen this book compared to Kitchen Confidential but in my opinion it doesn't come close to the immediacy of that book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This doesn't mean I don't think the book is worth reading.  It provides an excellent history of the rise of Michelin as the final word in rating cuisines, and of French cuisine in the twentieth century.  Perhaps if the author had used Loiseau's story as the backframe for those histories, instead of the other way around, the book would have been more successful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nicole.  I think you&#8217;ve hit it in a nutshell&#8211;I never felt as if I were there in his kitchen.  As I mentioned in the review, the book was meticulously researched, but the details were presented in a dry, &#8220;as reported by&#8221; kind of way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this book compared to Kitchen Confidential but in my opinion it doesn&#8217;t come close to the immediacy of that book.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t think the book is worth reading.  It provides an excellent history of the rise of Michelin as the final word in rating cuisines, and of French cuisine in the twentieth century.  Perhaps if the author had used Loiseau&#8217;s story as the backframe for those histories, instead of the other way around, the book would have been more successful for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nicole</title>
		<link>http://paperpalate.net/2006/06/04/life_and_death_in_haute_cuisine/#comment-296</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 06:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://paperpalate.net/2006/06/04/life_and_death_in_haute_cuisine/#comment-296</guid>
					<description>excellent review, these types of books are usually my favortie to read, a behind the curtain of sorts, but from what you said, seems  that Chelminski was unsuccessful on bring fact and passion together.  you saved me time now, i don't have to read it.   did he write this chef's story as if you could have been in his kitchen?&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent review, these types of books are usually my favortie to read, a behind the curtain of sorts, but from what you said, seems  that Chelminski was unsuccessful on bring fact and passion together.  you saved me time now, i don&#8217;t have to read it.   did he write this chef&#8217;s story as if you could have been in his kitchen?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
